Law Farm

If you think that the law of attraction is all you need to know about the spiritual law, think again... using power spiritual to change their lives and the lives of others depends on knowing spirit (or be aligned with God / universal intelligence) and application of spiritual laws with wisdom. Much attention has been paid in recent times with the law of attraction due to the huge amount of publicity surrounding "The secret", which began as a book, expanded to a DVD, and later became a film. But there are other spiritual or universal laws that can be studied and applied. Two sets of seven laws which I will briefly describe in this article are probably the best-known. Seven universal laws are attributed to the ancient Greek Hermes Trismegistus. These seven hermetic laws are very well known and are generally accepted by many as they contain great truths. Others believe that this is a lot of nonsense new was, but from my own experience, I believe that the truth is that there is in fact. The best treatment I've seen laws is sealed by Alan Seale in his book, soul mission, vision life. The universal seven hermetic laws are: the Act of the Mentalism - also known as law of the mind or the law of the spirit. Law has two aspects. The first aspect that says what the mind or spirit. Everything is born of thought or universal consciousness. Thinking creates. The second aspect is that everything that exists within the mind of God, and God's mind exists within everything. This is the central idea of many mystical traditions - that there is a great unit or Union with God. Correspondence - law often stated that "as up, down." "Below, is up." Microcosm of human level corresponds to the level macrocosm of the universe. Internal objects held in thinking level corresponds to the external level of objects in reality. The law of the vibration - Also called the law of resonance. This law says that everything is in motion. Matter, energy, thoughts... everything is in vibration. This Act has two secondary laws: the law of attraction and the law of change. The law of attraction says that equals attract - in other words, like vibrations attract or resonate with each other and different vibrations repel each other. For example, health thoughts can attract health; thoughts wealth can attract wealth. The law of change said that, since everything is in motion, change is constant and is expected to normal. The law of polarity - secondary law is the law of relativity, which says that everything is relative and nothing exists by itself. Everything is relative to other things. The primary law is that everything that exists on a spectrum. Which referred to often as opposite poles are the ends of a spectrum, but there are points across the spectrum that are degrees between the poles or opposite ends. Act of the rhythm - this law says that life, and even not of life (such as planets, moons, and stars), exists within an order or pattern, or combinations of cycles and patterns. The law of cause and effect - often described as "as well as crops, thus quoted". This Act provides that systems interaction, actions or events cause or lead to situations that give rise. Cause preceding effect. The Act of gender - this law is often referred to as "the yin and yang, and has two parts." The first part are said to be inside everything that is... male male and female energies be strong, energetic, and assertive; contemplative to be feminine, nourish and performance. The second part is that things come in their own time, and that there is a natural things develop and demonstrate gestation period. Another famous seven laws are the seven spiritual laws of success of a book of the same name by Deepak Chopra. For many years, I have used these seven laws as topics for contemplative meditation, so I am very familiar with them. His seven laws: the law of pure potentiality - spirit is pure awareness, and human beings we are pure consciousness. Pure consciousness is pure potentiality - the scope of the possibilities. The universe is creative and abundant. The Act of giving - this law says that the universe operates through dynamic Exchange. Intelligence and energy flows naturally. From the human point of view, giving and receiving are required to participate in this dynamic process. The law of cause and effect - every action generates a force energy returning to us of the same type. Give love brings love for us to change. Give money or value produces money or value returned to us in kind. The law of the minimum effort - effort can achieve natural way of participation in the universe. natural effort – the effort that is faithful to its own nature - is, "less" effort. The law of intention and desire - inherent to every intention and desire is the mechanism for its implementation; the intention and desire in the field of pure potentiality power have infinite organization. Intention and desire can lead to action (cause) that will have an effect. Intention and desire are also own thoughts (causes) that can create the outcome desired if (care) is clearly focused on the present. The law on the detachment - the detachment is renounce the commitment to results. Be free to step into the unknown, the field of the possibilities, and surrendered to the creative intelligence of the universe. Allows that the universe at the quantum to respond and react. Allows to move more freely. The Act of purpose in life - everyone has a purpose in life based on a unique gift or special talent. When using this unique service of other talents, we experience the glory of our own spirit a divine goal compliance and living a dream of the soul. There are some references to other spiritual laws such as the Act of love, the law of abundance, growth Act and the Act of giving- and they can or are not assigned to fourteen laws mentioned above. I think Yes, but I leave to your reasoning (or imagination) to find out how.
Now the spiritual laws can be (and have been) studied and analyzed what they mean for us, the potential consequences and human beings. They may have and have many different or subtle interpretations. But the key is that the laws have a spiritual meaning and also practical utility in the form in which you can apply to us we benefit - both spiritual and material. The key is to learn how to use effectively the spiritual laws. Laws can be applied separately, but it can be more effective when taken together or in combination. It is able to true spiritual is when a person with knowledge and wisdom spiritual laws applied to produce other ideas, spiritual happiness, peace of mind, love relationships, health, happiness, wealth and the true enjoyment of life. Spiritual take-away: learn more about universal and spiritual laws. Familiarize yourself with the laws - the most learn about universal laws that you're learning about the spirit. The more we know about spiritual laws, the more it can be applied. And the more you can apply all laws, more you will be able to use his spiritual power. On a spiritual power, you: come to be known, closer to the spirit, change their beliefs, because the new circumstances on their actions, attracting what you want in life, feel peace and happiness, and know the spiritual power that connects you to the Universal Declaration. Copyright 2007 productions new spirit and Posch Ray - all rights reserved Posch Ray is a student of long term spirituality and how spirituality can be used to make a difference in real life. His blog, new spirit today, includes articles and blogs about practical spirituality, the fullness of life, creating entries and using spiritual power to transform. His blog provides feedback spiritual books, web sites, eBooks, and other spirituality resources. Your articles can give insight into the spirit spiritual law and use their spiritual power.

Study of the history of piracy and hackers can be studied from the point of view of many vocations, including technological, socio-political, or legal identification. However piracy and pirates also you can look through a legal point of view. The importance of study from the prism of piracy illustrates best with what they considered piracy and pirates. Piracy is a crime, a violation of the law. Pirates are a class of criminals whose main crime was piracy. As piracy is a crime must be specific existence on the subject in its laws. As well as all criminal laws on piracy laws are used to define what actions or a combination of actions or omissions which constitute piracy. As well as all laws concerning piracy laws have a source. The origin of laws includes custom, statue, and treaties. The Act also provides firmness. Laws sometimes have exceptions except piracy law general om is the corso. Finally, piracy Act provides procedures for pirates and persecute pirates who allegedly defend against these accusations. II. Act of piracy and its sources. In the law that defines piracy; his many laws on piracy is however possible to assemble a definition of piracy. A person is guilty of piracy, if available, and "load" or attempts to remove and take another vessel of its cargo or passengers property on that vessel, or the Commander or member of the crew of a ship as a platform for the complete or attempted act of piracy. All abovementioned conduct shall unless the realization of the Act of piracy crew acting under and in accordance with a patent licence or otherwise which operates as a State apparatus. A guilty of piracy not only the Act of piracy should be carried out in international waters that there are at least 3 miles off the coast of mainland. The law prohibiting piracy not be limited to workers self-employed participate in traditional piracy, law also classifies people knowingly aid or teaming up with the pirates and hackers themselves Yes. The type of support or participation classified as piracy include conspiring with pirates, pirates, financing the purchase of goods used by pirates, possession of property stolen, advising them, directing from the coast give team or helping to recruit ect. These laws prohibiting piracy varied sources. As well as all major legislation part of laws prohibiting piracy of customary law or customary international law. Customary law is created on the basis of overtime to a significant number of persons or entities that use or not hiring an activity based on the belief of a legal duty or legal right. During the era of discovery, such countries, as England began to use statues as a tool against piracy. These principles such as offences in the Act 1535 Mar and the Act of piracy of 1698 statues said that piracy is illegal and the procedure to be used in cases of piracy. However, in England, these statues not completely overthrow the regime of customary law. These statues, as acts of piracy of 1698, and 1717 generally not often define piracy and allowed that the issue of the activities that constituted piracy to be answered by customary law. As regards the definition of acts which constitute early statues piracy only described specific actions such as piracy if such act cannot be considered piracy in customary law. That being so, any description of facts constitute piracy is not a codification of existing customary law, but an expansion of activities in which defines it as piracy. Statues therefore serves as a legal instrument for Governments to address crimes select marine gravity and the penalties for piracy. Examples of this practice are included in the 1698 and 1744 piracy and the statue of piracy expanded common definition of piracy to include the treacherous act of its citizens who perform functions in a Corsair enemy as piracy English ships to attack. In 1698 the British Government reviewed the law to include piracy captains and crews of vessels to voluntarily surrender their vessels to be used by hackers. The enlargement of the number of legally classified as piracy acts continued in the 19th century. In 1824 the British Parliament would continue the Congress in the expansion of the legal definition of piracy include ocean transport people to be used as slaves. Not with the position of the parliaments British expansion of the definition of piracy, 1997 British statue in general does not define what actions constitute piracy. In its 1997 Maritime Security Act quote wrote the Convention of the United Nations law of the sea. This latter Treaty prohibit piracy. III. Corso of course, no discussion on piracy is complete without talking about the legal form of piracy known as the Corsican. The Corsican participating State licensing private merchant seaman known as patent legal licence which entitles the marine license to steal an enemy and pirate ships. To operate under and in the field of brand written an act which is nominally would qualify as piracy would not be legally definable as piracy. A Corsair liscensed was immune to an accusation of piracy not only the country which issued the permit, but all other nations including the nation which was attacked by the privateer. Customary international law for the time required that other nations are a patent licence full faith and credit, and not to its holder a pirate. Customary international law defined pirates as legal members of their countries, the service to participate in a military operation of law. As a member of its service of countries which was immune from criminal for killing out in search of Corsican, charges and if captured they grant prisoner of war status. Not with standing legal status, resembled piracy. Privateers than motivated by profit. To pay the State a share of the prize that could keep the rest.

The institution of the Corsican gave all stakeholders including captains, crew, and owners of ships of the pirates a stroke of luck enormous legal and financial. In exchange for these services, where privateers envelope standards. To begin, its status as a privateer was dependent on the exploitation of a letter of licensing acts brand piracy that otherwise would be. The patenting of Corsican, while targeting the current captain is not held by Captain presented as an individual. The rights recognized by letter in place corresponds to the Office of the captain of the ship that was intended to be used as a Corsair ship, the master of each exercise of these rights as holder of an Office. Therefore, if the ship changed script rights and limits set out in the letter would be held by the captain's Office and shall be exercisable by the new captain. Only State party authorized party could give carte blanche. The process and the official right to grant such license varies depending on the nation. In Britain the right to issue a letter brand was nominally the Admiral Lord high head of the British Admiralty who published these licenses in the name of the King. In the majority of the colonies of America and the Caribbean of the Lord Admiral generally deputized a local official, general Governor colonies as Admiral or Vice Admiral colonies with the power to handle local including letters mark Maritime Affairs. . By allowing local colonial governors the power to issue letters of marks was decentralized process. When hostile erupted between the British governors various colonial empires quickly could be a large number of pirates to military and economic assets of their enemies. The colonial governors of programs included British privateers notoriously brutal as Roche Braziliano, and Henry Morgan men; these men turned into targets non-combatants with particularly cruel forms of murder and torture as a means to terrorize their victims to deliver their riches. However, in spite of his cruelty these Corsairs were extremely effective, destroyed or stolen much of Spanish colonial wealth recaptured colonies and helped ensure British rule. Decentralization for granting letters of mark allows the British Government to deny their responsibility for the actions of the Corsairs, while reaping rewards of his manner of Corsair neighborhood. If the British Government received foreign protests that simply might assert that it is capable of micromanagement of its rulers to thousands of miles away. If a Corsair person committed an atrocity Government British sometimes completely deny responsibility and say to the extent that know Corsair acts without a Charter Mark. To analyze the patent licence issuing process was extremely lax. Many people that when sent letters of Marque abused his privileges or degenerated into piracy right. Virtually all large Pirates of the Caribbean began his career as masters or crew of a Spaniards had similar procedures in pirates licenses such as the British. The Dutch source out the right of issuing patent licence to the company of the Dutch West Indies, the international premiere of trade company. However, the countries whose licence Corsican single protocol, where the most were the United States. The licensing authority was more centralized then in other countries. The steps required to give carte blanche Charter USA where also much more stringent than those in other countries. The institution of the Corsican gave all stakeholders including captains, crew, and owners of ships of the pirates a stroke of luck enormous legal and financial. In exchange for these services, where privateers envelope standards. To begin, its status as a privateer was dependent on the exploitation of a letter of licensing acts brand piracy that otherwise would be. The patenting of Corsican, while targeting the current captain is not held by Captain presented as an individual. The rights recognized by letter in place corresponds to the Office of the captain of the ship that was intended to be used as a Corsair ship, the master of each exercise of these rights as holder of an Office. Therefore, if the ship changed script rights and limits set out in the letter would be held by the captain's Office and shall be exercisable by the new captain. Only State party authorized party could give carte blanche. The process and the official right to grant such license varies depending on the nation. In Britain the right to issue a letter brand was nominally the Admiral Lord high head of the British Admiralty who published these licenses in the name of the King. In the majority of the colonies of America and the Caribbean of the Lord Admiral generally deputized a local official, general Governor colonies as Admiral or Vice Admiral colonies with the power to handle local including letters mark Maritime Affairs. . By allowing local colonial governors the power to issue letters of marks was decentralized process. When hostile erupted between the British governors various colonial empires quickly could be a large number of pirates to military and economic assets of their enemies. The colonial governors of programs included British privateers notoriously brutal as Roche Braziliano, and Henry Morgan men; these men turned into targets non-combatants with particularly cruel forms of murder and torture as a means to terrorize their victims to deliver their riches. However, in spite of his cruelty these Corsairs were extremely effective, destroyed or stolen much of Spanish colonial wealth recaptured colonies and helped ensure British rule. Decentralization for granting letters of mark allows the British Government to deny their responsibility for the actions of the Corsairs, while reaping rewards of his manner of Corsair neighborhood. If the British Government received foreign protests that simply might assert that it is capable of micromanagement of its rulers to thousands of miles away. If a Corsair person committed an atrocity Government British sometimes completely deny responsibility and say to the extent that know Corsair acts without a Charter Mark. To analyze the patent licence issuing process was extremely lax. Many people that when sent letters of Marque abused his privileges or degenerated into piracy right. Virtually all large Pirates of the Caribbean began his career as masters or crew of a Spaniards had similar procedures in pirates licenses such as the British. The Dutch source out the right of issuing patent licence to the company of the Dutch West Indies, the international premiere of trade company. However, the countries whose licence Corsican single protocol, where the most were the United States. The licensing authority was more centralized then in other countries. The steps required to give carte blanche Charter USA where also much more stringent than those in other countries. In the United States, the Constitution allows only to us issuing patents on Corsican Congress. This means that an aspiring hacker only receive carte blanche, provided both House of Congress vote for this and passes it on, and as any act of Congress, which was signed by the President of the United States. This rigorous process was likely indentation for detecting undesirable elements attracted by Corsairs. defence, including the right to call witnesses. Some suspected pirate acquitted English. If a part was acquitted, could not face a double risk. The English legal system was flawless. Their examples of corruption in the Admiralty Court. Also after 1698 he moved to England more inquisitorial cases of piracy trial model. This lessoned, but not English law security guards are destroyed completely.
Once a Corsair captain was granted the patent licence which would be subject to the rules set out in the letter of marque. The contents of the letter in terms of status and parameters that trademark holders are legally bound to follow. Corsican patents would be allocated for vital aspects of the mission. Would be been that the holder has right to target, methods that can be used and what date or event that causes the patent licence to expire, as well as the percentage as the monarch or the State was entitled. These terms when the case now that in some cases a violation could be an act of piracy. These terms perhaps the most is that its holder could attack. The terms that the State of nationality of ships was a legally capable of attacking, Corsair or if the letter was directed towards the State piratesw that applies to all the pirates. This term was very important because the corso was considered an act of war. If a privateer went beyond his Commission and attacked to a country that was not in the country, the Corsair that could force the privateer of entanglements countries not desired military and diplomatic war ships. Consequently, Governments took a hard line against misconduct such, and instructed his privateers attacked nationalities not authorized by the patent licence as pirates drawing. To be in conformity with the law, the proprietor of a patent licence could even attack a country in the country, who are the subject of the patent licence was war ships if countries where specific maritime transport was not mentioned in the letter of the mark. To solve this problem of privateers, among them William Kidd, made it a practice to ensure multiple cards brands to cover any enemy England whose ship that can have an opportunity to steal their privateering expedition. The Corsican licenses also could limit the actions and tactics of a Corsair could use against an enemy. These restrictions could limit the degree of force that could be used, as well as the goals and places that could attack. In the bad William Kidd Corsican predestined mission is instructed him to try to catch live pirates attempted to attach. These terms, where not always respected, where the notorious pirate Buccaneers for attacking places and methods prohibited in terms of the letters Marquis. Statements issued by the patent licence often made view join such violations. Articles of Corsican, patent sometimes, for its own revocation. Corsican patents issued the Dutch and French, where only valid for 6 months. Valid until peace was signed English letters. Final demand of privateers is to pay a fee to the Government or the monarch that licenses. For Kings English this tended to be 10% of the gross amount of the prizes. For the King of the English Awards piracy on a large part of their income because they needed the approval of the Parliament for the establishment of taxes. Privateteering was widely used before the era of discoveries until the post error Napoleonic. However in countries 19a began to take measures to put an end to the pirates. In 1856 the great European powers signed the Paris Declaration to ban the corso. The corso is and continues to be abolished. Paris Declaration does not end the discussion on the legality of the corsairs. A treaty Declaration it automatically binding for people was signed and ratified this last or acceded to it. Not all signed and ratified including United States, Mexico, Spain and other countries. In addition many more countries today where the colonies at the time of ratification, which is not party to the Treaty. Although the Treaty does not join automatically these Nations only by the existence is not an alternative route to the Paris Declaration that could prohibit the corso. The Declaration is binding for all countries if developed customary international. A treaty will evolve if it is the creation of the standard customary international law, was universally acceded to or ratified ratified by the Nations of the world, especially of those Nations that are more affected by the Treaty. Finally, the Treaty must have been met for a sufficient time period. The rule is clearly the creation of the rule, its statements a clear rule that "the Corsican abolished this passage autonomously clear rule of the conduct of the Corsican is abolished promotes occupies of general policy or standard and not a specific policy for the achievement of the general policy." Paris Declaration has been in force for 150 years, this time the number is long enough so that the international community as a whole to take conscience of that. End criteria require the Treaty to have wide ratification dissemination, especially States that provisions are relevant for. This approach is probably the criterion that the Declaration of the existence of Paris as customary law most falls short. Although the Paris Declaration had accepted across the Board that a number of countries that have not ratified including us, Mexico, Spain and several maritime States not. By many countries which did not exist at the time that was ratified today exist and have not ratified. Considering that it is the most affected by the prohibition of Corsican are countries with smaller navies that use the marque to supplement your fleet. Many countries at the time of the Treaty which refused to ratify that countries were not considered as naval powers in time, including United States and Mexico. Countries which existed but had no maritime force not bothered to ratify it. In addition, many countries that exist at present but not exists simultaneously with the creation of the Paris Declaration still have not ratified it. These countries are in typical development with naval forces very small. As such, is the argument that the Paris Declaration does not meet the broad dissemination, acceptance criteria so required emoluments for the provision of a treaty evolve in customary law has met. Therefore for the countries that have not ratified the Paris Declaration is not an argument that could be legally authorized to issue patents licence.
In England and his successor State of Britain had criminal piracy case procedures. While England, as well as all maritime States, adopted a hard-line against piracy, if indeed a pirate was captured and delivered to the civil authorities with important rights to due process. These rights include a trial by jury, as well as the right to perform a criminal defence. Before a hacker could be even tried had to be charged by a Commission especially designated for the purpose of investigating piracy. If a pirate who was attempted, not would be judged in a regular court, but the Admiralty had a judiciary with all offences committed by civilians offshore jurisdiction. This Court was chaired by Mr Admiral of England. It was entitled to act as judge in all cases of piracy while generally delegated this function to members on a regional basis. Depending on the time and place of went by several titles including vicealmirantes coast, "Admiral of Virginia" judge of the Court of Admiralty vice ect. Had to prove that the alleged pirate whether an act of piracy or carried out based on its intention to commit acts of piracy. The defendant was allowed also law to sent a defence, including the right to call witnesses. Some suspected pirate acquitted English. If a part was acquitted, could not face a double risk. The English legal system was flawless. Their examples of corruption in the Admiralty Court. Also after 1698 he moved to England more inquisitorial cases of piracy trial model. This lessoned, but not English law security guards are destroyed completely.
Defend pirates sometimes "declared forgiveness Kings", by which claimed immunity from prosecution. If the pirate had been alleged pardon from the King of the pirates would be immune to all offences persecution of receiving this amnesty. Periodically the English government proclaimed a conditional amnesty known as known as the "Pardon" Reyes. This was done in number as in 1698 (known then as the Act of grace) and later in 1718. To qualify for amnesty a pirate would deliver within the period prescribed in the proclamation. It would also have to comply with all other conditions of amnesty. The claims are expressly exempt particularly appalling pirates sometimes. Another defense against piracy that is now an anachronism is the benefit of clergy. The benefit of clergy is a right that the members of the clergy should be tried only in the courts of the Church and the right to be immune to prosecution in the secular courts. If a person declares benefit of clergy was essentially to affirm that the civil courts lack of personal jurisdiction over it, and it should already be released or reassigning him notably lenient ecclesiastical courts. At first glance this does not seem to apply to the pirates already that very few or none, where men of the clergy. However, hackers might be released by virtue of this doctrine, because the test to determine if one was a cleric was simply to recite a passage of his choice bibical judges. If he recites the passage correctly then for the purposes of a case, the accused is indisputably considered a man of the clergy and no evidence can be admitted in contradiction with the accused reason although the judge had reason to believe that the accused was not the clergy. The ease of proof was a clergyman who resembles invite fraudulent grounds as a means to escape from an accused in fact punishment so was by design. Act 16, centuries 17 and 18 of English was very tough. The English Government and the judiciary saw full manipulation of the benefit of the clergy as a form of lessoning hardness of legal English justice and criminal systems without altering them basically This was not a legal defence full proof that the judge had discretion in verse of the Bible would recite and may simply opt for a verse from the pirate lower level of education is unlikely that recite Word by Word. This defence was not generally available for certain offences such as murder and rape. Therefore, if a person dead hackers could face harsh justice for that. The defence did not last all piracy era. The Act of 1717 made piracy in benefit of clergy inapplicable in cases of piracy.
Finally a strategy of Defense used by pirates was "written dear belly". This defence could only be used by hackers woman who was pregnant at the time of sentencing. Under English law a woman convicted of a capital offence that will have a temporary relief of the death penalty if she was pregnant and that pregnancy could check medically. This defence was used in a case of piracy on two occasions for female pirates, Ann Bonny and Mary Reed. In the case of Ann Bonny this temporary relief, probably saved his you life. It seems that to months to see this young single mother spend their days in a prison colonial, ultimately, created in his jailer, pity for her misery. As a result he was released apparently without the formal authorization or was not allowed to escape with no attempt to stop her, or even record their fugitive status. If these defences didn't the sentenced person took home the penalty until the middle of the 19th century the punishment was death almost always.
Piracy as any other field had applicable laws. Some of these laws punished other piracy legalized piracy. However all tried to order something that basically has no end.

One of the most fundamental requirements of a civil society is the rule of law which means that people must follow the law of the land, regardless of their status or position in society. In the modern world, developed countries are proud of their society is governed by the rule of law, while the majority of the developing countries such as India feel ashamed of their society does not have the rule of law. Developed countries are the model for developing countries, where the rule of law remains a distant dream.

Societies that follow the rule of law often considered more civilised since there is much more order in the society. Everything in these societies seems in order. Paths are clean, meadows and parks are very well maintained, the Government officials working in the Office, train and there are public transport in time. In addition, virtually no corruption in public office. People are well paid, deliver improved efficiency and keep everything clean and orderly. These societies seem perfect for people from other parts of the world that often wondered why cannot be like them.

All societies need laws to its existence. Although the laws may be different in each society, however, there are some basic principles that are common to all the laws of the world. These fundamental principles are equal, the brotherhood, justice and freedom. The Constitution of India, for example, incorporates these objectives in the preamble to the Constitution aimed at ensuring justice for all citizens, freedom, equality and promote the spirit of fraternity among them.

These principles are so universal in nature that are place in all civilized societies of the world. Great surprises that matter, the result of the rule of law is actually quite the opposite. The more civilized is a society, the more is the inequality among its population - more injustice to those without, less freedom, due to the strict application of the law and more hatred among citizens on grounds of race, caste and religion. What is going wrong in the implementation of the so-called rule of law?

Law of nature Indian thinkers at the Vedic, i.e. around 3000 years before the birth of Christ, discovered that the universe does not perform its functions of random, but follows certain laws. These were called "Rita" the universal laws or principles that guided the universe. The progress of man can be attributed largely in the understanding of these basic principles of nature and their exploitation for the benefit of the human race at the expense of the rest of the creations. The man laws are therefore contrary to the laws of nature such as humanos-céntrica and is not designed for all the creations of God or nature.

One of the basic differences between the hombre-hecho - laws and the laws of nature is that the laws of nature are spontaneous, because they require no effort in the implementation. For example, in a natural part of the Earth as a forest land produces trees, plants, fruits and vegetables spontaneously without irrigation or selection. The nature gives rain timely and fertilizers to new plants. Forests and mountains are covered with green and beauty, which is purely natural since it comes without any effort.

On the contrary, the creations made by man as parks, trees, plants are artificially. They may also appear as beautiful as the natural, however, cannot survive without effort regulate of man. Imagine a park that is not held for a few months, or a house without clean for months. You will lose all its beauty and soon was filled with dust and weeds. No building or modern gadget can survive without external effort of man. However, all natural creations are able to survive on their own and maintain its existence, and enjoy life without any external support.

The laws of nature are so treat each species (and men not only) with equality. In a forest, each species receives its share of food, air and water to live a life worthy without relying on any other creation. The nature makes no distinction between one species and the other as all species are the children of God.

However, in the world of man, every other creature die if it is not useful to man. They can survive only if it can be useful for the man. The world of man does not treat any other creature of nature with respect and does not provide any right to equality, freedom, justice, fraternity. Ingeniously usurps this universal right and is applicable only to human beings. For all other minor species, has created a man laws, calling it "the law of the jungle"or""survival of the fittest"justifying their dominance over the creations weak." The fact, however, is that the laws of the jungle are much more fair and equal for all species than the hombre-hecho - law.

Most men aren't worried about the way they treat the animals to a lesser extent felt that "the survival of the fittest" theory is more logical that the laws of nature. However, forget that all principles created in the universe has to be applied on them, and that may not always be a beneficiary. Made by the hombre-leyes is not restricted to animals, but that soon spread its wings to cover human beings. This is where the conflict between man and begins to man that gives rise to hatred and war. The man feels the pinch when the law of the jungle applies on them and the law of nature is denied to him. He is injured when he is treated as weeds by society.

The weeds: the adverse nature plants?

One of the most interesting creations of the natural world is weed. The weeds are undesirable vegetation in the plant Kingdom. The weeds is defined as any plant that is not measured by human society and usually tends to grow in excess or compete with the flora of valuation. The weeds are plants that are considered by humans unattractive, undesirable, or problematic.

In the natural world, the man has to continuously combat weeds to which their artificial plants survive. The weeds grow automatically and whether artificial gardens do not have the support of the man, is soon surpassed by weeds and the field or the garden is full of weeds. The weeds are created by nature (God) since no human effort is needed to grow. However, are so powerful that the man has to protect its continuous these weeds creation so that all creation of civilised society is destroyed. The weeds are so undesirable for human beings in the world of plants as criminals in human society.

Criminals: evil required for civil society similar to the weeds in the natural world, there is a growing criminals in civilized societies. Who are these criminals? Why do they grow? The criminals are healthy people or they are mentally ill as often thought that the civilized world?

Criminals are defined as persons who commit crimes. The crime is defined as an act which constitutes a violation of the law is punishable by law. The crime is generally considered an act of evil and the criminals are often seen as an evil created by Diablo, for there to destroy people civilized, the sons of God.

There are many similarities between the criminals and weeds. Criminals grow automatically in all societies and society must work hard to eliminate these criminals. Criminals as weeds are so powerful and competitive to have the power to defeat civilized peoples. They are therefore fighting jointly by society. However, in any society, there is no offence, and there are criminals. We are used to look at the criminals as there is no need to weeds. However, if God (nature) is the creator of everything, then everything in this world must have been created with a purpose. "What could be the purpose of the creation of criminals?" We wonder.

Criminals are as a matter of fact, the creation of the civilized world. In a civilized world, there would be no law, so there can be no violation of the law and, therefore, not criminal. If we are to understand the usefulness of the criminals in the civilised world, we must imagine nature without weed world. In a world, all the plants must be cultivated by man and artificial irrigation - channels, wells and other systems of irrigation for agriculture. Certainly, the man only grow these crops and plants that are useful to humans and other species that will not survive in the world of man. In addition, man power is limited and all effort, that can just be responsible for a tiny part of the world by artificial plantations, so the rest of the physical world would be without plants, and thus no oxygen and animal life and the eco-system. This will soon lead to the end of the world, including humans.
Fortunately, people automatically called criminals grow in any civil society as soon as man creates the laws governing it. The man laws are always questioned by them, since they are mostly against the laws of nature, equality, justice, freedom and brotherhood. States have always faced the opposition of these people who violate the law and are known as criminals. They may look ugly as weeds, but only to provide oxygen to society for his life. Thus, in the seed, people recognize, not as delinquents but as heroes.

The path of heroism while that men hate crimes, which pays cult heroes. He can be your most valuable possession is, his life in a single call of his hero. Who are these heroes? Are civilized people law-abiding or defying the law, the criminals? Take the example of Mahatma Gandhi in the modern world. Perhaps it was the largest criminal at the time of British rule in India and was imprisoned several times accused of being a war against the State. He spent more than 15 years in prison for his various crimes. However, the people of India it is called "Father of the country" and love him more than anyone civilized in the land. Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in jail, however, a national hero, he is not only for South Africa, but for the whole world.

In the story, there are numerous examples of great people who have violated the law and have been punished for their crimes. The list includes people like Christ, Muhammad, Socrates, and Galileo. It is this people that changed the history of the world and they are worshipped as heroes with reason by the masses, even after the death of.

How many people I have ever known to they have become heroes without violating the law and committing crimes at the time? Perhaps none. Heroes are not created by following the law but for violating the law.